Such, For Example, Is A Hypothesis That
It Should Not Be Attributed To The Evangelist, But To Another Luke,
Also Called 'Saint,' And A Florentine By Birth.
This painter lived
in the eleventh century - that is to say, about seven centuries
after the image of Oropa had been known and venerated!
This is
indeed an anachronism.
"Other difficulties drawn either from the ancient discipline of the
Church, or from St. Luke the Evangelist's profession, which was
that of a physician, vanish at once when it is borne in mind -
firstly, that the cult of holy images, and especially of that of
the most blessed Virgin, is of extreme antiquity in the Church, and
of apostolic origin as is proved by ecclesiastical writers and
monuments found in the catacombs which date as far back as the
first century (see among other authorities, Nicolas, "La Vergine
vivente nella Chiesa," lib. iii. cap. iii. SS 2); secondly, that
as the medical profession does not exclude that of artist, St. Luke
may have been both artist and physician; that he did actually
handle both the brush and the scalpel is established by respectable
and very old traditions, to say nothing of other arguments which
can be found in impartial and learned writers upon such matters."
I will only give one more extract. It runs:-
"In 1855 a celebrated Roman portrait-painter, after having
carefully inspected the image of the Virgin Mary at Oropa, declared
it to be certainly a work of the first century of our era." {24}
Enter page number
PreviousNext
Page 155 of 279
Words from 41349 to 41603
of 75076
