A recueillir
les graines de vers a soie,' What is understood by the latter process may
be seen from Plate I. in Julien's earlier work on sericulture,[2] where
the paper from the bark of the mulberry tree is likewise mentioned.
"The Chi p'u, a treatise on paper, written by Su I-kien toward the close
of the tenth century, enumerates among the various sorts of paper
manufactured during his lifetime paper from the bark of the mulberry tree
(sang p'i) made by the people of the north.[3]
"Chinese paper-money of mulberry bark was known in the Islamic World in the
beginning of the fourteenth century; that is, during the Mongol period.
Accordingly it must have been manufactured in China during the Yuan
Dynasty. Ahmed Shibab Eddin, who died in Cairo in 1338 at the age of 93,
and left an important geographical work in thirty volumes, containing
interesting information on China gathered from the lips of eye-witnesses,
makes the following comment on paper-money, in the translation of Ch.
Schefer:[4]
"'On emploie dans le Khita, en guise de monnaie, des morceaux d'un papier
de forme allongee fabrique avec des filaments de muriers sur lesquels est
imprime le nom de l'empereur. Lorsqu'un de ces papiers est use, on le
porte aux officiers du prince et, moyennant une perte minime, on recoit un
autre billet en echange, ainsi que cela a lieu dans nos hotels des
monnaies, pour les matieres d'or et d'argent que l'on y porte pour etre
converties en pieces monnayees.'
"And in another passage: 'La monnaie des Chinois est faite de billets
fabriques avec l'ecorce du murier. Il y en a de grands et de petits....
Ou les fabrique avec des filaments tendres du murier et, apres y avoir
oppose un sceau au nom de l'empereur, on les met en circulation.'[5]
"The banknotes of the Ming Dynasty were likewise made of mulberry pulp, in
rectangular sheets one foot long and six inches wide, the material being
of a greenish colour, as stated in the Annals of the Dynasty.[6] It is
clear that the Ming Emperors, like many other institutions, adopted this
practice from their predecessors, the Mongols. Klaproth[7] is wrong in
saying that the assignats of the Sung, Kin, and Mongols were all made from
the bark of the tree cu (Broussonetia), and those of the Ming from all
sorts of plants.
"In the Hui kiang chi, an interesting description of Turkistan by two
Manchu officials, Surde and Fusambo, published in 1772,[8] the following
note headed 'Mohamedan Paper' occurs:
"'There are two sorts of Turkistan paper, black and white, made from
mulberry bark, cotton and silk refuse equally mixed, resulting in a
coarse, thick, strong, and tough material. It is cut into small rolls
fully a foot long, which are burnished by means of stones, and then are
fit for writing.'
"Sir Aurel Stein[9] reports that paper is still manufactured from mulberry
trees in Khotan. Also J. Wiesner,[10] the meritorious investigator of
ancient papers, has included the fibres of Morus alba and M. nigra
among the material to which his researches extended.
"Mulberry-bark paper is ascribed to Bengal in the Si yang ch'ao kung tien
lu by Wu Kien-hwang, published in 1520.[11]
"As the mulberry tree is eagerly cultivated in Persia in connection with
the silk industry, it is possible also that the Persian paper in the
banknotes of the Mongols was a product of the mulberry.[12] At any rate,
good Marco Polo is cleared, and his veracity and exactness have been
established again."
XXIV., p. 427.
VALUE OF GOLD.
"L'or valait quatre fois son poids d'argent au commencement de la dynastie
Ming (1375), sept ou huit fois sous l'empereur Wan-li de la meme dynastie
(1574), et dix fois a la fin de la dynastie (1635); plus de dix fois sous
K'ang hi (1662); plus de vingt fois sous le regne de K'ien long; dix-huit
fois au milieu du regne de Tao-koang (1840), quatorze fois au commencement
du regne de Hien-fong (1850); dix-huit fois en moyenne dans les annees
1882-1883. En 1893, la valeur de l'or augmenta considerablement et egala
28 fois celle de l'argent; en 1894, 32 fois; au commencement de 1895, 33
fois; mais il baissa un peu et a la fin de l'annee il valait seulement 30
fois plus." (Pierre HOANG, La Propriete en Chine, 1897, p. 43.)
XXVI., p. 432.
CH'ING SIANG.
Morrison, Dict., Pt. II, Vol. I., p. 70, says: "Chin-seang, a Minister
of State, was so called under the Ming Dynasty." According to Mr. E.H.
Parker (China Review, XXIV., p. 101), Ching Siang were abolished in
1395.
In the quotation from the Masalak al Absar instead of Landjun (Lang
Chang), read Landjun (Lang Chung).
XXXIII., pp. 447-8. "You must know, too, that the Tartars reckon their
years by twelves; the sign of the first year being the Lion, of the second
the Ox, of the third the Dragon, of the fourth the Dog, and so forth up to
the twelfth; so that when one is asked the year of his birth he answers
that it was in the year of the Lion (let us say), on such a day or night,
at such an hour, and such a moment. And the father of a child always takes
care to write these particulars down in a book. When the twelve yearly
symbols have been gone through, then they come back to the first, and go
through with them again in the same succession."
"Ce temoignage, writes Chavannes (T'oung Pao, 1906, p. 59), n'est pas
d'une exactitude rigoureuse, puisque les animaux n'y sont pas nommes a
leur rang; en outre, le lion y est substitue au tigre de l'enumeration
chinoise; mais cette derniere difference provient sans doute de ce que
Marco Polo connaissait le cycle avec les noms mongols des animaux; c'est
le leopard dout il a fait le lion.