Marino Sanudo the Elder,
though not using the term trireme, says it was well understood from
ancient authors that the Romans employed their rowers three to
a bench (p. 59).
[4] "Ad terzarolos" (Secreta Fidelium Crucis, p. 57). The Catalan
Worthy, Ramon de Muntaner, indeed constantly denounces the practice of
manning all the galleys with terzaruoli, or tersols, as his term
is. But his reason is that these thirds-men were taken from the oar
when crossbowmen were wanted, to act in that capacity, and as such
they were good for nothing; the crossbowmen, he insists, should be men
specially enlisted for that service and kept to that. He would have
some 10 or 20 per cent, only of the fleet built very light and manned
in threes. He does not seem to have contemplated oars three-banked,
and crossbowmen besides, as Sanudo does. (See below; and Muntaner,
pp. 288, 323, 525, etc.)
In Sanudo we have a glimpse worth noting of the word soldiers
advancing towards the modern sense; he expresses a strong preference
for soldati (viz. paid soldiers) over crusaders (viz.
volunteers), p. 74.
[5] L'Armata Navale, Roma, 1616, pp. 150-151.
[6] See a work to which I am indebted for a good deal of light and
information, the Engineer Giovanni Casoni's Essay: "Dei Navigli
Poliremi usati nella Marina dagli Antichi Veneziani," in
"Esercitazioni dell' Ateneo Veneto," vol. ii. p. 338. This great
Quinquereme, as it was styled, is stated to have been struck by
a fire-arrow, and blown up, in January 1570.
[7] Pantera, p. 22.
[8] Lazarus Bayfius de Re Navali Veterum, in Gronovii Thesaurus, Ven.
1737, vol. xi. p. 581. This writer also speaks of the Quinquereme
mentioned above (p. 577).
[9] Marinus Sanutius, p. 65.
[10] See the woodcuts opposite and at p. 37; also Pantera, p. 46
(who is here, however, speaking of the great-oared galleys), and
Coronelli, i. 140.
[11] Casoni, p. 324. He obtains these particulars from a manuscript work
of the 16th century by Cristoforo Canale.
[12] Signor Casoni (p. 324) expresses his belief that no galley of the
14th century had more than 100 oars. I differ from him with
hesitation, and still more as I find M. Jal agrees in this view. I
will state the grounds on which I came to a different conclusion. (1)
Marino Sanudo assigns 180 rowers for a galley equipped ai Terzaruoli
(p. 75). This seemed to imply something near 180 oars, for I do not
find any allusion to reliefs being provided. In the French galleys of
the 18th century there were no reliefs except in this way, that in
long runs without urgency only half the oars were pulled. (See Mem.
d'un Protestant condamne aux Galeres, etc., Reimprimes, Paris, 1865,
p. 447.) If four men to a bench were to be employed, then Sanudo seems
to calculate for his smaller galleys 220 men actually rowing (see pp.
75-78). This seems to assume 55 benches, i.e., 28 on one side and 27
on the other, which with 3-banked oars would give 165 rowers. (2)
Casoni himself refers to Pietro Martire d'Anghieria's account of a
Great Galley of Venice in which he was sent ambassador to Egypt from
the Spanish Court in 1503. The crew amounted to 200, of whom 150 were
for working the sails and oars, that being the number of oars in each
galley, one man to each oar and three to each bench. Casoni assumes
that this vessel must have been much larger than the galleys of the
14th century; but, however that may have been, Sanudo to his galley
assigns the larger crew of 250, of whom almost exactly the same
proportion (180) were rowers. And in he galeazza described by Pietro
Martire the oars were used only as an occasional auxiliary. (See his
Legationis Babylonicae Libri Tres, appended to his 3 Decads
concerning the New World; Basil. 1533, f. 77 ver.) (3) The galleys
of the 18th century, with their great oars 50 feet long pulled by six
or seven men each, had 25 benches to the side, and only 4' 6" (French)
gunnel-space to each oar. (See Mem. d'un Protest., p. 434.) I
imagine that a smaller space would suffice for the 3 light oars of the
mediaeval system, so that this need scarcely be a difficulty in the
face of the preceding evidence. Note also the three hundred rowers
in Joinville's description quoted at p. 40. The great galleys of the
Malay Sultan of Achin in 1621 had, according to Beaulieu, from 700 to
800 rowers, but I do not know on what system.
[13] Marinus Sanutius, p. 78. These titles occur also in the Documenti
d'Amore of Fr. Barberino referred to at p. 117 of this volume: -
"Convienti qui manieri
Portolatti e prodieri
E presti galeotti
Aver, e forti e dotti."
[14] Spinello's works, according to Vasari, extended from 1334 till late
in the century. A religious picture of his at Siena is assigned to
1385, so the frescoes may probably be of about the same period. Of the
battle represented I can find no record.
[15] Engraved in Jal, i. 330; with other mediaeval illustrations of the
same points.
[16] To these Casoni adds Sifoni for discharging Greek fire; but this he
seems to take from the Greek treatise of the Emperor Leo. Though I
have introduced Greek fire in the cut at p. 49, I doubt if there is
evidence of its use by the Italians in the thirteenth century.
Joinville describes it like something strange and new.
In after days the artillery occupied the same position, at the bow of
the galley.
Great beams, hung like battering rams, are mentioned by Sanudo, as
well as iron crow's-feet with fire attached, to shoot among the
rigging, and jars of quick-lime and soft soap to fling in the eyes of
the enemy.