We Should Not Willingly Trust To Yorkshire
Or Sussex To Give Us Their Contributions To The National Income,
Especially If Yorkshire And Sussex Had Small Houses Of Commons Of
Their Own In Which That Question Of Giving Might Be Debated.
It may
be very well for Rhode Island or New York to be patriotic!
But what
shall be done with any State that declines to evince such
patriotism? The legislatures of the different States may be invited
to impose a tax of five per cent. on all incomes in each State; but
what will be done if Pennsylvania, for instance, should decline, or
Illinois should hesitate? What if the legislature of Massachusetts
should offer six per cent., or that of New Jersey decide that four
per cent. was sufficient? For awhile the arrangement might possibly
be made to answer the desired purpose. During the first ebullition
of high feeling the different States concerned might possibly vote
the amount of taxes required for Federal purposes. I fear it would
not be so, but we may allow that the chance is on the card. But it
is not conceivable that such an arrangement should be continued
when, after a year or two, men came to talk over the war with calmer
feelings and a more critical judgment. The State legislatures would
become inquisitive, opinionative, and probably factious. They would
be unwilling to act, in so great a matter, under the dictation of
the Federal Congress; and, by degrees, one and then another would
decline to give its aid to the central government. However broadly
the acknowledgment may have been made that the levying of direct
taxes was necessary for the nation, each State would be tempted to
argue that a wrong mode and a wrong rate of levying had been
adopted, and words would be forthcoming instead of money. A resort
to such a mode of taxation would be a bad security for government
stock.
All matters of taxation, moreover, should be free from any taint of
generosity. A man who should attempt to lessen the burdens of his
country by gifts of money to its exchequer would be laying his
country under an obligation for which his country would not thank
him. The gifts here would be from States, and not from individuals
but the principle would be the same. I cannot imagine that the
United States government would be willing to owe its revenue to the
good-will of different States, or its want of revenue to their
caprice. If under such an arrangement the Western States were to
decline to vote the quota of income tax or property tax to which the
Eastern States had agreed - and in all probability they would
decline - they would in fact be seceding. They would thus secede
from the burdens of their general country; but in such event no one
could accuse such States of unconstitutional secession.
It is not easy to ascertain with precision what is the present
amount of debt due by the United States; nor probably has any
tolerably accurate guess been yet given of the amount to which it
may be extended during the present war.
Enter page number
PreviousNext
Page 211 of 275
Words from 108893 to 109419
of 142339