I
Cannot Pay That Compliment To The President's Choice Of Servants.
But The Relationship Between Congress And The President's Ministers
Would Gradually Come To Resemble That Which Exists Between
Parliament And The Queen's Ministers.
The Secretaries of State and
of the Treasury would after awhile obtain that honor of leading the
Houses which is exercised by our high political officers, and the
dignity added to the positions would make the places worthy of the
acceptance of great men.
It is hardly so at present. The career of
one of the President's ministers is not a very high career as things
now stand; nor is the man supposed to have achieved much who has
achieved that position. I think it would be otherwise if the
ministers were the leaders of the legislative houses. To Congress
itself would be given the power of questioning and ultimately of
controlling these ministers. The power of the President would no
doubt be diminished as that of Congress would be increased. But an
alteration in that direction is in itself desirable. It is the
fault of the present system of government in the United States that
the President has too much of power and weight, while the Congress
of the nation lacks power and weight. As matters now stand,
Congress has not that dignity of position which it should hold; and
it is without it because it is not endowed with that control over
the officers of the government which our Parliament is enabled to
exercise.
The want of this close connection with Congress and the President's
ministers has been so much felt that it has been found necessary to
create a medium of communication. This has been done by a system
which has now become a recognized part of the machinery of the
government, but which is, I believe, founded on no regularly
organized authority; at any rate, no provision is made for it in the
Constitution, nor, as far as I am aware, has it been established by
any special enactment or written rule. Nevertheless, I believe I am
justified in saying that it has become a recognized link in the
system of government adopted by the United States. In each House
standing committees are named, to which are delegated the special
consideration of certain affairs of State. There are, for instance,
Committees of Foreign Affairs, of Finance, the Judiciary Committee,
and others of a similar nature. To these committees are referred
all questions which come before the House bearing on the special
subject to which each is devoted. Questions of taxation are
referred to the Finance Committee before they are discussed in the
House; and the House, when it goes into such discussion, has before
it the report of the committee. In this way very much of the work
of the legislature is done by branches of each House, and by
selected men whose time and intellects are devoted to special
subjects. It is easy to see that much time and useless debate may
be thus saved; and I am disposed to believe that this system of
committees has worked efficiently and beneficially.
Enter page number
PreviousNext
Page 187 of 275
Words from 96401 to 96920
of 142339